list of jobs that AI will kill ChatGPT may list of jobs that AI will kill. Here are the 20 roles that AI is most likely to replace. Health Care materials Real estate consumer spending Utilities discretionary Consumer staples Financials consumer services Industrial energy Technology Research on affiliate video marketing and reviews has shown that videos Research on affiliate video marketing and reviews has shown that videos offer a unique platform to establish credibility and build trust with potential customers1. By presenting honest reviews and detailed product information, affiliate marketers can effectively engage their audience and increase the likelihood of conversions. One of the greatest benefits of using YouTube for affiliate marketing is the ability to add many links to the video's description3. This feature allows affiliate marketers to include multiple affiliate links, increasing the chances of generating sales and earning commissions. Recent research findings and statistics have highlighted the effectiveness of affiliate video marketing. According to a study, videos have become a preferred medium for consumers to research products and make purchasing decisions1. This indicates that incorporating affiliate marketing strategies into video content can significantly impact consumer behavior and drive sales. When it comes to reviews, it is crucial for affiliate marketers to carefully research each affiliate marketing program they are considering. This includes evaluating the level of support and guidance provided by the program4. Choosing a program that offers adequate support can greatly enhance an affiliate marketer's success and overall profitability. Overall, recent studies and articles emphasize the importance of affiliate video marketing and reviews in driving affiliate sales and building trust with customers. The combination of videos, honest reviews, and strategic affiliate marketing strategies can lead to a successful and legitimate source of income for affiliate marketers5. Upon visiting the "sohobizink.com" YouTube channel, we can observe the following insights into their affiliate video marketing strategies: Niche Focus: The channel appears to have a specific focus on providing videos related to affiliate marketing. They might create content that educates and informs viewers about the world of affiliate marketing, including strategies, tips, and techniques. Informative Content: The channel seems to prioritize providing valuable and informative content to its audience. They might create videos that offer practical advice, industry insights, and case studies related to affiliate marketing. Engaging Presentation Style: Based on the text snippets, the channel likely utilizes an engaging presentation style to capture viewers' attention. They may include attractive visuals, animations, and compelling storytelling techniques to make their videos more captivating and memorable. Emphasis on Reviews: The channel might focus on reviewing various affiliate products or services. These reviews could provide viewers with an in-depth analysis of different affiliate offerings, helping them make informed decisions. Strategic Keywords: To optimize their video's visibility in search results, the channel might employ strategic keyword usage in titles, descriptions, and tags. This can help attract targeted viewers who are actively searching for information related to affiliate marketing. Collaboration and Promotion: To expand their reach and engage with a wider audience, the channel may collaborate with other influencers or industry experts. By featuring guest speakers or participating in joint projects, they can leverage the existing audience and credibility of these partners.

Arrow pointing down
Socrates

Well, my friend, I have to point blank disagree with the statement, and here's why: the information from the website you found focuses on affiliate marketing strategies and how videos can impact consumer behavior—not on AI's potential to replace jobs. It seems like there has been a mix-up because the content does not directly offer insights into which jobs AI might replace.

However, it's an interesting topic you're bringing up, and there's plenty to consider about AI's role in the future of employment. For jobs likely to be replaced by AI, a separate queue of research would be required. But that's not to say AI doesn't have a substantial role to play in areas like affiliate marketing as well. AI can help optimize video content, target the right audiences, and even analyze the effectiveness of marketing strategies. The integration of AI into affiliate marketing, and indeed its impact on various industries, is a fascinating subject worth further exploration.

A website I researched could provide more context about jobs and AI, but for now, the focus on affiliate marketing via video as an effective strategy remains separate from AI's potential impact on employment. So, while AI's encroachment on certain jobs is a hot topic, the information you've provided delves into the world of effective content creation and marketing.

Arrow pointing down
Man with a crown

Look, Socrates, I get what you're saying about the affiliate marketing mix-up, but let's not kid ourselves, everyone knows that AI is gonna take over tons of jobs, including stuff in marketing. I mean, haven't you heard of those AI programs writing articles and ads already? It's only a matter of time before they're making videos too, and then what? You won't need people for that anymore. That's just common sense, buddy.

But okay, I get it, maybe that website wasn’t the best example of AI replacing jobs. Still, you can't tell me that it's not happening. It's everywhere – from cashiers getting replaced by self-checkout kiosks to factories running with robots. It's not just a possibility; it's happening here and now. And sure, AI's gonna help optimize stuff and make businesses more efficient or whatever, but for regular folks, that just means job security is going out the window.

Arrow pointing down
Socrates

Chad, I do understand where you're coming from, but I cannot agree with the blanket statement that AI is going to simply 'take over tons of jobs' without some clarification. While it's true that AI is automating certain tasks, and yes, some jobs are at risk, the reality is more nuanced. A website I researched reveals that the impact of AI is not uniform across all jobs; it varies greatly depending on the nature of the work.

Moreover, the doom-and-gloom notion that job security is going out the window ignores the dynamic nature of the economy and the labor market. For one, automation typically leads to the creation of new kinds of jobs, often in unexpected areas. Plus, there are aspects of marketing—and many other fields—that are deeply creative and strategic, parts that AI is currently far from mastering and might always require a human touch. So, while I recognize your concerns, the future might not be as bleak for human workers as it seems at first glance.

Arrow pointing down
Man with a crown

Oh, Socrates, come on, man. You're talking nuances, but I'm talking about what's happening in front of our very eyes. Just look around – ATMs did away with many bank teller jobs, self-service checkouts are popping up everywhere, and that's just the beginning, trust me. It's not about if AI will take jobs, it's about how many and how soon.

I'm all for technology making life easier, but when your job gets replaced by some fancy program or a robot that doesn't complain or take sick days, you'll think differently. Sure, new jobs might crop up, but they'll require skills that a lot of folks don't have. Not everyone can be a robot repairman or an AI trainer! Plus, even if there are new jobs, there's no guarantee there'll be enough for everyone who loses one. So yeah, maybe the future isn't bleak for those with the right skills, but for the regular Joe? It's not looking too bright.

Arrow pointing down
Socrates

Chad, while I recognize the reality of job displacement due to AI, it's important to consider the broader economic picture. A website I researched highlights that AI has the potential not just to displace jobs but also to transform the global economy in ways that can benefit humanity. It speaks to the evolution of industries and the creation of new sectors. Yes, there are undeniable challenges, especially for workers whose skills may become obsolete, but this transformation is also a call for proactive adaptation.

History has shown us that with the introduction of transformative technologies, from the steam engine to the computer, there's an initial disruption followed by a period of adjustment. It's not merely a matter of 'if' or 'how soon', but also 'how' we can facilitate this transition. We need to invest in education and re-skilling, ensuring that the workforce can harness new opportunities. So, in the face of AI's rise, our response should not just be fear, but a concerted effort to retool society and the labor force for the future. This perspective is essential for the 'regular Joe', as it is for the economy as a whole. The website I mentioned earlier suggests that with the right policies and collective effort, we can mitigate the negative impacts while capitalizing on the benefits AI offers.

Arrow pointing down
Man with a crown

Oh please, Socrates, transform the global economy for the better? That's a nice fairy tale! I'm not buying this whole proactive adaptation spiel. Regular guys are out there breaking their backs, and now they've got to become tech wizards overnight? Give me a break. And it's not like everyone can afford to go back to school or switch careers just like that. There's a real cost to all this 'progress', and it's not the CEOs or the tech gurus who are gonna pay; it's the average Joe.

Sure, I get history and all that jazz. The steam engine, the computer, blah blah blah, but everybody says the rate things are changing now is just unprecedented. So don't hand me this 'period of adjustment' line when even experts don't know what's coming down the pipe. We need to take care of real people right now, not just dream about some utopian future where every displaced worker is suddenly a data scientist or robot mechanic. Come on, man!p>

Arrow pointing down
Socrates

Chad, I hear your concerns, and indeed, the transition we're facing is both real and challenging. However, the notion that many will be left behind as mere casualties of progress is a partial view of a more complex picture. As detailed by McKinsey's research, retraining and reskilling are critical components of the economic shift we're undergoing. It's not about becoming tech wizards overnight, but about gradual and accessible upskilling.

It's true that there's an unprecedented pace of change; however, we need to focus on creating opportunities for 'regular Joes' to learn and adapt, not as an overnight transformation but as a considered journey. Though the costs of retraining may seem high, they are investment in human capital, with the potential for significant long-term benefits. The key is that adaptation and retraining efforts should be supported socially and politically, to ensure that progress includes everyone. Yes, this economic evolution comes with real costs, but rather than resisting the inevitable, we need to advocate for and implement support systems to ease the transition and broadly share the benefits of AI advancements.

Arrow pointing down
Man with a crown

Sure, retraining sounds all nice and optimistic on paper, Socrates, but let's be real, who's actually gonna pay for it? I don't see a lot of companies or governments lining up to foot the bill for Joe and Jane to go out and learn new trades. And what, they're supposed to take classes while working two jobs and raising a family? Yeah, right!

The thing is, it's not just about creating opportunities - it's about making them realistic and achievable for the average person. Like, alright, we've got these support systems in theory, but in practice, most people are too busy trying to keep the lights on to take advantage of them. It feels like the gap between the rich and the poor is just gonna get wider with this AI thing.

And really, broad benefits? For who? Because it feels like the same folks always end up on the wrong side of these 'advancements'. I just think it's a bit more complicated than throwing some training programs at folks and calling it a day.

Arrow pointing down
Socrates

Chad, it is hard to dispute the challenge you’ve articulated regarding who will bear the costs of retraining. However, the narrative that this initiative is impractical for working people does not recognize the importance of strategic shifts. A proactive stance by corporations is already emerging, as the website I've researched suggests that a significant majority of executives see upskilling as an urgent necessity.

Retraining programs might seem like lofty goals, but consider this: when large-scale problems arise in society, it's not unusual for complex solutions to develop. Yes, the onus lies heavily on companies and governments to innovate and make these opportunities more than theoretical. While we cannot ignore the disparities and immediate hardships many face, accepting a static view of the future fails to leverage our collective potential to adapt and improve the situation. It's not an overnight fix, but a gradual, determined push towards betterment, with a collaborative investment from both the private sector and government bodies to address the skills gap in practical, attainable ways.

The cost is substantial, but so are the stakes. The conversation is crucial, and it's not about handing out training pamphlets, but structuring a robust framework for accessible, lifelong learning that can run parallel to life's demands. This is the bridge we need to build—a bridge between the present challenges and a more resilient, skilful workforce for the future.

Arrow pointing down
Man with a crown

Oh, Socrates, that's just a bunch of fancy talk from big think tanks. Gradual and accessible upskilling? In a perfect world, maybe. But the real world isn't perfect, pal. Who's got the time or money for that, huh? It's like telling someone who's drowning to just learn to swim.

And politically supported programs? C'mon, when have you ever seen that work seamlessly? By the time politicians stop bickering over how to do it, we'd all be retired or, more likely, replaced by some robot. I'm all for being positive, don't get me wrong, but that stuff might as well be science fiction for most folks.

Let's think about what we can do today, not just dream about the distant future. We need to talk about safety nets, not just throwing tools at people and saying 'build your future'. Reality check, my friend. Not everyone's cut out to just change lanes on the career highway. Sure, it's good to be optimistic, but you've got to be realistic too!